Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
sat4j
sat4j
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 56
    • Issues 56
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 1
    • Merge Requests 1
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • SAT4J
  • sat4jsat4j
  • Issues
  • #53

Closed
Open
Created Dec 12, 2011 by Daniel Le Berre@leberreOwner

Allow both lower and upper bounding on the ManyCore solvers.

We already shipped parallel solvers with both Resolution and Cutting Planes. It would be nice to have both Lower Bound and Upper Bounding done in parallel. This is not possible currently, since parallel optimizers do cooperate to compute the best upper bound currently. The parallelization need to move to a higher level to allow this.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None